![]() Noting this, the present Research Topic asked for contributions addressing this issue and related areas. Despite evidence of a link between conspiratorial thinking and resistance to engage with public health communications, as evidenced during the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies to date have considered the influence of conspiratorial thinking on diet. Examples include, theories related to genetically modified foods, sugar consumption, light/low fat products, and relationships between calorie burning and exercise. In this regard, validation of mis (inaccurate) and/or dis(deliberate incorrect) information can adversely affect healthy life choices and habits. Although not all conspiracies are false (e.g., Watergate, MKUltra, and Operation Northwoods), theories by definition typically convey false information as truth, or possibility. In extreme cases, conspiratorial thinking predominates as a prevailing worldview, where high-order beliefs (e.g., mistrust of authority), askew perception of the world. ![]() These themes combine so that conspiratorial thinking reflects the belief that powerful individuals/groups, through exploitation, secretly enact actions to achieve, predetermined nefarious goals. ![]() These include, but are not restricted to, exploitation of power, collusion, intention, clandestineness, deception, control, manipulation, and premeditation. In this context, conspiracy theories are an important source of inaccurate information that can inappropriately influence diet and detrimentally affect health.Īlthough there is no single, consensually agreed definition of conspiratorial thinking, commonly used delineations embody canonical themes. Accordingly, information that undermines health dietary patterns is potentially harmful to both individuals and society. This was necessary since eating healthy foods and consuming drinks in the right proportions and amounts is vital to physical and psychological wellbeing. Acknowledging this gap in the literature, the editors encouraged authors to highlight relevant developments and contemporary contributions within and around the topic domain. While scholarly interest in the origins, purpose, and consequences of conspiratorial thinking and endorsement of concomitant theories has an established tradition in psychological, work assessing the effects of conspiratorial thinking on general and individual diet-related perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors remains limited.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |